linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v7 01/64] KVM: Fix memslot boundary condition for large page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y6RKhDVaeqVZwMCZ@zn.tnic>
Date:   Thu, 22 Dec 2022 13:16:04 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        jroedel@...e.de, thomas.lendacky@....com, hpa@...or.com,
        ardb@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
        vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
        luto@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, slp@...hat.com,
        pgonda@...gle.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
        dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com, tobin@....com, vbabka@...e.cz,
        kirill@...temov.name, ak@...ux.intel.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
        marcorr@...gle.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
        alpergun@...gle.com, dgilbert@...hat.com, jarkko@...nel.org,
        ashish.kalra@....com, harald@...fian.com,
        Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v7 01/64] KVM: Fix memslot boundary condition for
 large page

On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 01:39:53PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> From: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@....com>
> 
> Aligned end boundary causes a kvm crash, handle the case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index b1953ebc012e..b3ffc61c668c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -7159,6 +7159,9 @@ static void kvm_update_lpage_private_shared_mixed(struct kvm *kvm,
>  		for (gfn = first + pages; gfn < last; gfn += pages)
>  			linfo_set_mixed(gfn, slot, level, false);
>  
> +		if (gfn == last)
> +			goto out;

I'm guessing this was supposed to be "return;" here:

arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c: In function ‘kvm_update_lpage_private_shared_mixed’:
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c:7090:25: error: label ‘out’ used but not defined
 7090 |                         goto out;
      |                         ^~~~

/me goes and digs deeper.

Aha, it was a "return" but you reordered the patches and the one adding
the out label:

KVM: x86: Add 'update_mem_attr' x86 op

went further down and this became the first but it didn't have the label
anymore.

Yeah, each patch needs to build successfully for bisection reasons, ofc.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette