linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: simatic-ipc: correct name of a model

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y6RRInVaXtOGr8hA@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Dec 2022 14:44:18 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Henning Schild <henning.schild@...mens.com>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: simatic-ipc: correct name of a model

On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:37:19AM +0100, Henning Schild wrote:
> What we called IPC427G should be renamed to BX-39A to be more in line
> with the actual product name.

Can you tell what does the current name mean?

Depending on that I would consider either your approach here or perhaps just
adding a comment in each of the places.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko