Message-ID: <1884934.6tgchFWduM@suse>
Date:   Thu, 22 Dec 2022 15:27:08 +0100
From:   "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
To:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Cc:     Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@...l.ru>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] fs/ufs: Replace kmap() with kmap_local_page()

On giovedì 22 dicembre 2022 06:41:01 CET Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 06:28:02PM +0100, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > kmap() is being deprecated in favor of kmap_local_page().
> > 
> > There are two main problems with kmap(): (1) It comes with an overhead as
> > the mapping space is restricted and protected by a global lock for
> > synchronization and (2) it also requires global TLB invalidation when the
> > kmap’s pool wraps and it might block when the mapping space is fully
> > utilized until a slot becomes available.
> > 
> > With kmap_local_page() the mappings are per thread, CPU local, can take
> > page faults, and can be called from any context (including interrupts).
> > It is faster than kmap() in kernels with HIGHMEM enabled. Furthermore,
> > the tasks can be preempted and, when they are scheduled to run again, the
> > kernel virtual addresses are restored and still valid.
> > 
> > Since its use in fs/ufs is safe everywhere, it should be preferred.
> > 
> > Therefore, replace kmap() with kmap_local_page() in fs/ufs. kunmap_local()
> > requires the mapping address, so return that address from ufs_get_page()
> > to be used in ufs_put_page().
> 
> I don't see the calls to kunmap() in ufs_rename converted here?
> 
> Did I miss them?
>

No, it's my fault.
I must have used "grep" on all files in fs/ufs, but I forgot to run it :-(

While at this... I'm wondering whether or not we could benefit from a WARNING 
about the use of kunmap(). I'm talking about adding this too to checkpatch.pl, 
exactly as we already have it for catching the deprecated use of kmap(). 
 
>
> I think those calls need to be changed to ufs_put_page() calls in a 
precursor
> patch to this one unless I'm missing something.
> 

Again I think that you are not missing anything and that your suggestion 
sounds good.

I'll replace the three kunmap() + put_page() with three calls to 
ufs_put_page() in ufs_rename(). I'll do these changes in patch 3/4. Instead 
the current 3/4 patch will move ahead and become 4/4.

>
> > Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> > Suggested-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  fs/ufs/dir.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> >  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/ufs/dir.c b/fs/ufs/dir.c
> > index 9fa86614d2d1..ed3568da29a8 100644
> > --- a/fs/ufs/dir.c
> > +++ b/fs/ufs/dir.c
> > @@ -61,9 +61,9 @@ static int ufs_commit_chunk(struct page *page, loff_t 
pos,
> > unsigned len)> 
> >  	return err;
> >  
> >  }
> > 
> > -static inline void ufs_put_page(struct page *page)
> > +static inline void ufs_put_page(struct page *page, void *page_addr)
> > 
> >  {
> > 
> > -	kunmap(page);
> > +	kunmap_local((void *)((unsigned long)page_addr & PAGE_MASK));
> 
> Any address in the page can be passed to kunmap_local() as this mask is done
> internally.
> 

I know that any address can be passed and that the bitwise and is performed 
internally in kunmap_local_indexed(). This is why I've never done something 
like this in any other of my precedent conversions. 

However, I thought that Al should have had reasons to suggest to call 
kunmap_local() this way. Copy-pasted from one of his message (https://
lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y4E++JERgUMoqfjG@...IV/) while commenting the one patch 
old conversions:

--- begin ---

 -static inline void ufs_put_page(struct page *page)
> +inline void ufs_put_page(struct page *page, void *page_addr)
>  {
> -	kunmap(page);
> +	kunmap_local(page_addr);

Make that
	kunmap_local((void *)((unsigned long)page_addr & PAGE_MASK));
and things become much easier.

>  	put_page(page);
>  }

--- end ---

Did I misinterpret his words?
However, it's my fault again because I should have asked why :-(

> >  	put_page(page);
> >  
> >  }
> > 
> > @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ ino_t ufs_inode_by_name(struct inode *dir, const struct
> > qstr *qstr)> 
> >  	de = ufs_find_entry(dir, qstr, &page);
> >  	if (de) {
> >  	
> >  		res = fs32_to_cpu(dir->i_sb, de->d_ino);
> > 
> > -		ufs_put_page(page);
> > +		ufs_put_page(page, de);
> > 
> >  	}
> >  	return res;
> >  
> >  }
> > 
> > @@ -99,18 +99,17 @@ void ufs_set_link(struct inode *dir, struct
> > ufs_dir_entry *de,> 
> >  	ufs_set_de_type(dir->i_sb, de, inode->i_mode);
> >  	
> >  	err = ufs_commit_chunk(page, pos, len);
> > 
> > -	ufs_put_page(page);
> > +	ufs_put_page(page, de);
> > 
> >  	if (update_times)
> >  	
> >  		dir->i_mtime = dir->i_ctime = current_time(dir);
> >  	
> >  	mark_inode_dirty(dir);
> >  
> >  }
> > 
> > -static bool ufs_check_page(struct page *page)
> > +static bool ufs_check_page(struct page *page, char *kaddr)
> > 
> >  {
> >  
> >  	struct inode *dir = page->mapping->host;
> >  	struct super_block *sb = dir->i_sb;
> > 
> > -	char *kaddr = page_address(page);
> > 
> >  	unsigned offs, rec_len;
> >  	unsigned limit = PAGE_SIZE;
> >  	const unsigned chunk_mask = UFS_SB(sb)->s_uspi->s_dirblksize - 1;
> > 
> > @@ -185,23 +184,32 @@ static bool ufs_check_page(struct page *page)
> > 
> >  	return false;
> >  
> >  }
> > 
> > +/*
> > + * Calls to ufs_get_page()/ufs_put_page() must be nested according to the
> > + * rules documented in kmap_local_page()/kunmap_local().
> > + *
> > + * NOTE: ufs_find_entry() and ufs_dotdot() act as calls to ufs_get_page()
> > + * and must be treated accordingly for nesting purposes.
> > + */
> > 
> >  static void *ufs_get_page(struct inode *dir, unsigned long n, struct page
> >  **p) {
> > 
> > +	char *kaddr;
> > +
> > 
> >  	struct address_space *mapping = dir->i_mapping;
> >  	struct page *page = read_mapping_page(mapping, n, NULL);
> >  	if (!IS_ERR(page)) {
> > 
> > -		kmap(page);
> > +		kaddr = kmap_local_page(page);
> > 
> >  		if (unlikely(!PageChecked(page))) {
> > 
> > -			if (!ufs_check_page(page))
> > +			if (!ufs_check_page(page, kaddr))
> > 
> >  				goto fail;
> >  		
> >  		}
> >  		*p = page;
> > 
> > -		return page_address(page);
> > +		return kaddr;
> > 
> >  	}
> >  	return ERR_CAST(page);
> >  
> >  fail:
> > -	ufs_put_page(page);
> > +	ufs_put_page(page, kaddr);
> > 
> >  	return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
> >  
> >  }
> > 
> > @@ -227,6 +235,13 @@ ufs_next_entry(struct super_block *sb, struct
> > ufs_dir_entry *p)> 
> >  					fs16_to_cpu(sb, p-
>d_reclen));
> >  
> >  }
> > 
> > +/*
> > + * Calls to ufs_get_page()/ufs_put_page() must be nested according to the
> > + * rules documented in kmap_local_page()/kunmap_local().
> > + *
> > + * ufs_dotdot() acts as a call to ufs_get_page() and must be treated
> > + * accordingly for nesting purposes.
> > + */
> > 
> >  struct ufs_dir_entry *ufs_dotdot(struct inode *dir, struct page **p)
> >  {
> >  
> >  	struct ufs_dir_entry *de = ufs_get_page(dir, 0, p);
> > 
> > @@ -238,12 +253,15 @@ struct ufs_dir_entry *ufs_dotdot(struct inode *dir,
> > struct page **p)> 
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> > 
> > - *	ufs_find_entry()
> > + * Finds an entry in the specified directory with the wanted name. It
> > returns a + * pointer to the directory's entry. The page in which the 
entry
> > was found is + * in the res_page out parameter. The page is returned 
mapped
> > and unlocked. + * The entry is guaranteed to be valid.
> > 
> >   *
> > 
> > - * finds an entry in the specified directory with the wanted name. It
> > - * returns the page in which the entry was found, and the entry itself
> > - * (as a parameter - res_dir). Page is returned mapped and unlocked.
> > - * Entry is guaranteed to be valid.
> 
> I don't follow why this comment needed changing for this patch.  It probably
> warrants it's own patch.
> 

Sure, the removal of the name of function is a different logical change, so 
I'll probably leave it as it was. 

> > + * On Success ufs_put_page() should be called on *res_page.
> > + *
> > + * ufs_find_entry() acts as a call to ufs_get_page() and must be treated
> > + * accordingly for nesting purposes.
> > 
> >   */

But this last part should be still added. Am I wrong?

> >  struct ufs_dir_entry *ufs_find_entry(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr 
*qstr,
> >  				struct page **res_page)
> > 
> > @@ -282,7 +300,7 @@ struct ufs_dir_entry *ufs_find_entry(struct inode 
*dir,
> > const struct qstr *qstr,> 
> >  					goto found;
> >  				
> >  				de = ufs_next_entry(sb, de);
> >  			
> >  			}
> > 
> > -			ufs_put_page(page);
> > +			ufs_put_page(page, kaddr);
> > 
> >  		}
> >  		if (++n >= npages)
> >  		
> >  			n = 0;
> > 
> > @@ -360,7 +378,7 @@ int ufs_add_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode
> > *inode)> 
> >  			de = (struct ufs_dir_entry *) ((char *) de + 
rec_len);
> >  		
> >  		}
> >  		unlock_page(page);
> > 
> > -		ufs_put_page(page);
> > +		ufs_put_page(page, kaddr);
> > 
> >  	}
> >  	BUG();
> >  	return -EINVAL;
> > 
> > @@ -390,7 +408,7 @@ int ufs_add_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode
> > *inode)> 
> >  	mark_inode_dirty(dir);
> >  	/* OFFSET_CACHE */
> >  
> >  out_put:
> > -	ufs_put_page(page);
> > +	ufs_put_page(page, kaddr);
> > 
> >  	return err;
> >  
> >  out_unlock:
> >  	unlock_page(page);
> > 
> > @@ -468,13 +486,13 @@ ufs_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context
> > *ctx)
> > 
> >  					       ufs_get_de_namlen(sb, 
de),
> >  					       fs32_to_cpu(sb, de-
>d_ino),
> >  					       d_type)) {
> > 
> > -					ufs_put_page(page);
> > +					ufs_put_page(page, kaddr);
> > 
> >  					return 0;
> >  				
> >  				}
> >  			
> >  			}
> >  			ctx->pos += fs16_to_cpu(sb, de->d_reclen);
> >  		
> >  		}
> > 
> > -		ufs_put_page(page);
> > +		ufs_put_page(page, kaddr);
> > 
> >  	}
> >  	return 0;
> >  
> >  }
> > 
> > @@ -485,10 +503,10 @@ ufs_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context
> > *ctx)
> > 
> >   * previous entry.
> >   */
> >  
> >  int ufs_delete_entry(struct inode *inode, struct ufs_dir_entry *dir,
> > 
> > -		     struct page * page)
> > +		     struct page *page)
> > 
> >  {
> >  
> >  	struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
> > 
> > -	char *kaddr = page_address(page);
> > +	char *kaddr = (char *)((unsigned long)dir & PAGE_MASK);
> 
> I feel like this deserves a comment to clarify that dir points somewhere in
> the page we need the base address of.

OK, it sounds reasonable.

> >  	unsigned int from = offset_in_page(dir) &
> >  	~(UFS_SB(sb)->s_uspi->s_dirblksize - 1); unsigned int to =
> >  	offset_in_page(dir) + fs16_to_cpu(sb, dir->d_reclen); loff_t pos;
> > 
> > @@ -527,7 +545,7 @@ int ufs_delete_entry(struct inode *inode, struct
> > ufs_dir_entry *dir,> 
> >  	inode->i_ctime = inode->i_mtime = current_time(inode);
> >  	mark_inode_dirty(inode);
> >  
> >  out:
> > -	ufs_put_page(page);
> > +	ufs_put_page(page, kaddr);
> > 
> >  	UFSD("EXIT\n");
> >  	return err;
> >  
> >  }
> > 
> > @@ -551,8 +569,7 @@ int ufs_make_empty(struct inode * inode, struct inode
> > *dir)> 
> >  		goto fail;
> >  	
> >  	}
> > 
> > -	kmap(page);
> > -	base = (char*)page_address(page);
> > +	base = kmap_local_page(page);
> 
> NIT: I'd make this conversion a separate patch.
> 
> Ira
> 

We've always done multiple conversions at the same time if in the same file, 
even if they were unrelated.

I don't understand why we want to change the usual procedure. Can you please 
elaborate a bit more on this topic?

Thanks so much for finding the missing conversions and for your other comments 
and advice on this patch.

Fabio

> >  	memset(base, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> >  	
> >  	de = (struct ufs_dir_entry *) base;
> > 
> > @@ -569,7 +586,7 @@ int ufs_make_empty(struct inode * inode, struct inode
> > *dir)> 
> >  	de->d_reclen = cpu_to_fs16(sb, chunk_size - UFS_DIR_REC_LEN(1));
> >  	ufs_set_de_namlen(sb, de, 2);
> >  	strcpy (de->d_name, "..");
> > 
> > -	kunmap(page);
> > +	kunmap_local(base);
> > 
> >  	err = ufs_commit_chunk(page, 0, chunk_size);
> >  
> >  fail:
> > @@ -585,9 +602,9 @@ int ufs_empty_dir(struct inode * inode)
> > 
> >  	struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
> >  	struct page *page = NULL;
> >  	unsigned long i, npages = dir_pages(inode);
> > 
> > +	char *kaddr;
> > 
> >  	for (i = 0; i < npages; i++) {
> > 
> > -		char *kaddr;
> > 
> >  		struct ufs_dir_entry *de;
> >  		
> >  		kaddr = ufs_get_page(inode, i, &page);
> > 
> > @@ -620,12 +637,12 @@ int ufs_empty_dir(struct inode * inode)
> > 
> >  			}
> >  			de = ufs_next_entry(sb, de);
> >  		
> >  		}
> > 
> > -		ufs_put_page(page);
> > +		ufs_put_page(page, kaddr);
> > 
> >  	}
> >  	return 1;
> >  
> >  not_empty:
> > -	ufs_put_page(page);
> > +	ufs_put_page(page, kaddr);
> > 
> >  	return 0;
> >  
> >  }
> > 
> > --
> > 2.39.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists