[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2086a52-4db8-e247-43de-c78ffa479634@foss.st.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 15:30:14 +0100
From: Gatien CHEVALLIER <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
<alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<Oleksii_Moisieiev@...m.com>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <loic.pallardy@...com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] bus: stm32_sys_bus: add support for STM32MP15 and
STM32MP13 system bus
On 12/22/22 11:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/12/2022 18:30, Gatien Chevallier wrote:
>> This driver is checking the access rights of the different
>> peripherals connected to the system bus. If access is denied,
>> the associated device tree node is skipped so the platform bus
>> does not probe it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>
>> ---
>> MAINTAINERS | 6 ++
>> drivers/bus/Kconfig | 9 ++
>> drivers/bus/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/bus/stm32_sys_bus.c | 180 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 196 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/bus/stm32_sys_bus.c
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index 886d3f69ee64..768a8272233e 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -19522,6 +19522,12 @@ L: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
>> S: Maintained
>> F: drivers/spi/spi-stm32.c
>>
>> +ST STM32 SYS BUS DRIVER
>> +M: Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>
>> +S: Maintained
>> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/st,sys-bus.yaml
>> +F: drivers/bus/stm32_sys_bus.c
>> +
>> ST STPDDC60 DRIVER
>> M: Daniel Nilsson <daniel.nilsson@...x.com>
>> L: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/Kconfig b/drivers/bus/Kconfig
>> index 7bfe998f3514..638bf5839cb0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bus/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/bus/Kconfig
>> @@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ config QCOM_SSC_BLOCK_BUS
>> i2c/spi/uart controllers, a hexagon core, and a clock controller
>> which provides clocks for the above.
>>
>> +config STM32_SYS_BUS
>> + bool "STM32 System bus controller"
>> + depends on ARCH_STM32
>
> || COMPILE_TEST
Sure, I will add this in V3
>
>> + default MACH_STM32MP157 || MACH_STM32MP13
>> + help
>> + Say y to enable device access right verification before device probing.
>> + If access not granted, device won't be probed and an error message will
>> + provide the reason.
>
> (...)
>
>> +
>> +static int stm32_sys_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct sys_bus_data *pdata;
>> + struct resource *res;
>> + void __iomem *mmio;
>> + struct stm32_sys_bus_match_data *mdata;
>> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> +
>> + pdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!pdata)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> + mmio = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>
> Use helper for these two.
Ok, I will use devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
>
>> + if (IS_ERR(mmio))
>> + return PTR_ERR(mmio);
>> +
>> + pdata->sys_bus_base = mmio;
>> +
>> + mdata = (struct stm32_sys_bus_match_data *)of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
>
> Why do you need the cast?
I do not :) TBH, mdata is not useful at all. Changing to directly assign
to pdata->pconf, that is now const there is no reason to modify it.
>
>> + if (!mdata)
>
> Can you explain the case when this can actually happen? If it can, you
> have bug in ID table.
No I cannot as the driver is probed. It is only a sanity check, I can
remove it for V3. However the function can return NULL... Would you
prefer an explicit check on NULL or a simple removal?
>
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + pdata->pconf = mdata;
>> + pdata->dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pdata);
>> +
>> + stm32_sys_bus_populate(pdata);
>> +
>> + /* Populate all available nodes */
>> + return of_platform_populate(np, NULL, NULL, &pdev->dev);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct stm32_sys_bus_match_data stm32mp15_sys_bus_data = {
>> + .max_entries = STM32MP15_ETZPC_ENTRIES,
>> + .sys_bus_get_access = stm32_etzpc_get_access,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct stm32_sys_bus_match_data stm32mp13_sys_bus_data = {
>> + .max_entries = STM32MP13_ETZPC_ENTRIES,
>> + .sys_bus_get_access = stm32_etzpc_get_access,
>
> It's the same as previous, drop.
Yes, ops is useless, I will directly call stm32_etzpc_get_access() in V3.
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id stm32_sys_bus_of_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "st,stm32mp15-sys-bus", .data = &stm32mp15_sys_bus_data },
>> + { .compatible = "st,stm32mp13-sys-bus", .data = &stm32mp13_sys_bus_data },
>> + {}
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stm32_sys_bus_of_match);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver stm32_sys_bus_driver = {
>> + .probe = stm32_sys_bus_probe,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "stm32-sys-bus",
>> + .of_match_table = stm32_sys_bus_of_match,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init stm32_sys_bus_init(void)
>> +{
>> + return platform_driver_register(&stm32_sys_bus_driver);
>> +}
>> +arch_initcall(stm32_sys_bus_init);
>> +
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Best regards,
Gatien
Powered by blists - more mailing lists