[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221222144752.2h7huydvbo5zxxtv@SoMainline.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 15:47:52 +0100
From: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: disallow clocks when not used
On 2022-12-22 15:03:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/12/2022 14:33, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > On 2022-12-22 11:36:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 22/12/2022 11:16, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> >>> Is this missing a cc to linux-arm-msm?
> >>
> >> No, it is not (or maybe but then fix MAINTAINERS). The policy is to use
> >> get_maintainers.pl to CC people.
> >
> > Yes, that is the question: is it in MANTAINERS and if not, why not?
>
> You can check by yourself if it is there.
It's not there.
> Why not? I don't know. Could be that no one ever added it there.
Let's leave it like that then :)
<snip>
> > sc7280 has two IOMMU nodes. One with clocks (should not be in this
> > list), the other doesn't have clocks (should be in this list).
> >
> > How do you want to address that?
>
> No, because it is the same compatible.
That is the point. We can tell them apart based on the presence of
"qcom,adreno-smmu" though. But if it is not spitting out any errors
right now, let's not bother.
- Marijn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists