linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: disallow clocks when not used

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Dec 2022 15:47:52 +0100
From:   Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: disallow clocks when not used

On 2022-12-22 15:03:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/12/2022 14:33, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > On 2022-12-22 11:36:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 22/12/2022 11:16, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> >>> Is this missing a cc to linux-arm-msm?
> >>
> >> No, it is not (or maybe but then fix MAINTAINERS). The policy is to use
> >> get_maintainers.pl to CC people.
> > 
> > Yes, that is the question: is it in MANTAINERS and if not, why not?
> 
> You can check by yourself if it is there.

It's not there.

> Why not? I don't know. Could be that no one ever added it there.

Let's leave it like that then :)

<snip>

> > sc7280 has two IOMMU nodes.  One with clocks (should not be in this
> > list), the other doesn't have clocks (should be in this list).
> > 
> > How do you want to address that?
> 
> No, because it is the same compatible.

That is the point.  We can tell them apart based on the presence of
"qcom,adreno-smmu" though.  But if it is not spitting out any errors
right now, let's not bother.

- Marijn