linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Introduce STM32 system bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Dec 2022 17:39:22 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>
Cc:     alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        Oleksii_Moisieiev@...m.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        loic.pallardy@...com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Introduce STM32 system bus

On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:04:57AM +0100, Gatien Chevallier wrote:
> Document STM32 System Bus. This bus is intended to control firewall
> access for the peripherals connected to it.

Why is this an "RFC"?  That usually means "I have more work to do on it,
but I'll send it out now anyway".  What work is left?

And for most code, I know I don't review "RFC" changes as there are too
many "real" patches being submitted where people think their code is
ready to be merged.  Other reviewers might think otherwise, but be aware
of this...

thanks,

greg k-h