[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y6SZjDKWve8/T/ld@qemulion>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 23:23:16 +0530
From: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@...rosoft.com>,
Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen@...ux.microsoft.com>, drv@...lo.com
Subject: [PATCH] soc: imx: imx93-pd: No need to set device_driver owner
There is no need to exclusively set the .owner member of the struct
device_driver when defining the platform_driver struct. The Linux core
takes care of setting the .owner member as part of the call to
module_platform_driver() helper function.
Issue identified using the platform_no_drv_owner.cocci Coccinelle
semantic patch.
Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
---
Note: Proposed change compile tested only using ARM64 defconfig.
drivers/soc/imx/imx93-pd.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/imx93-pd.c b/drivers/soc/imx/imx93-pd.c
index 4d235c8c4924..832deeed8fd6 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/imx/imx93-pd.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/imx/imx93-pd.c
@@ -164,7 +164,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx93_pd_ids);
static struct platform_driver imx93_power_domain_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "imx93_power_domain",
- .owner = THIS_MODULE,
.of_match_table = imx93_pd_ids,
},
.probe = imx93_pd_probe,
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists