linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/13] blk-mq: use switch/case to improve readability in blk_mq_try_issue_list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Dec 2022 14:57:52 +0800
From:   Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     axboe@...nel.dk, dwagner@...e.de, hare@...e.de,
        ming.lei@...hat.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, john.garry@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] blk-mq: use switch/case to improve readability in
 blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly


on 12/23/2022 1:53 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 08:52:22PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>> +			blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, false, list_empty(list));
> 
> Please try to avoid the overly long line here.
Get it and I will fix this in next version. Thanks!
> That beng said blk_mq_request_bypass_insert is simply a horrible
> API.  I think we should do something like this:
I am not quite follow this. I guess this API is horrible for two possbile reasons:
1. It accepts two bool parameters which may be confusing betwwen them.
2. It adds additional checks for if we need to insert at head and if we need to run
queue which is already checked by caller.

Anyway, it seems another patch is needed for this, but I don't know proper way to
send this patch. Add your patch to this patchset or you want to send a single one
after this patchset.

-- 
Best wishes
Kemeng Shi