linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Add support for syspower protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Dec 2022 11:11:27 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     sudeep.holla@....com, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Add support for
 syspower protocol

On 22/12/2022 19:38, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Add new SCMI Syspower protocol bindings definitions and example.
> 
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
> ---
> Got lost in translation probably...from txt to yaml

Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC.  It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries.  Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.

> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml         | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> index 1c0388da6721..f3dd77a470dd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> @@ -111,6 +111,12 @@ properties:
>      required:
>        - '#power-domain-cells'
>  
> +  protocol@12:
> +    type: object
> +    properties:
> +      reg:
> +        const: 0x12
> +

Why? It did not got lost, it's already covered by pattern. If you refer
to particular warning, please paste it in commit msg. Otherwise it looks
incorrect.


Best regards,
Krzysztof