| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20221223005739.1295925-26-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:57:37 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 25/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle KVM bookkeeping in page-track
APIs, not callers
Get/put references to KVM when a page-track notifier is (un)registered
instead of relying on the caller to do so. Forcing the caller to do the
bookkeeping is unnecessary and adds one more thing for users to get
wrong, e.g. see commit 9ed1fdee9ee3 ("drm/i915/gvt: Get reference to KVM
iff attachment to VM is successful").
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h | 10 ++++------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 23 ++++++++++-------------
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
index 415537ce45b4..66a0d7c34311 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
@@ -47,12 +47,10 @@ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node {
enum pg_level kvm_page_track_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
enum pg_level max_level);
-void
-kvm_page_track_register_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
- struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n);
-void
-kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
- struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n);
+int kvm_page_track_register_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n);
+void kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n);
int kvm_write_track_add_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn);
int kvm_write_track_remove_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
index bc54afc1919c..1af431a41f71 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
@@ -157,17 +157,22 @@ int kvm_page_track_init(struct kvm *kvm)
* register the notifier so that event interception for the tracked guest
* pages can be received.
*/
-void
-kvm_page_track_register_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
- struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n)
+int kvm_page_track_register_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n)
{
struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+ if (!kvm || kvm->mm != current->mm)
+ return -ESRCH;
+
+ kvm_get_kvm(kvm);
+
head = &kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
hlist_add_head_rcu(&n->node, &head->track_notifier_list);
write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_page_track_register_notifier);
@@ -175,9 +180,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_page_track_register_notifier);
* stop receiving the event interception. It is the opposed operation of
* kvm_page_track_register_notifier().
*/
-void
-kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
- struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n)
+void kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n)
{
struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
@@ -187,6 +191,8 @@ kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
hlist_del_rcu(&n->node);
write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
synchronize_srcu(&head->track_srcu);
+
+ kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
index f9d21d29f533..e4227ac6ab58 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
@@ -670,30 +670,28 @@ static bool __kvmgt_vgpu_exist(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
static int intel_vgpu_open_device(struct vfio_device *vfio_dev)
{
struct intel_vgpu *vgpu = vfio_dev_to_vgpu(vfio_dev);
+ int ret;
if (vgpu->attached)
return -EEXIST;
- if (!vgpu->vfio_device.kvm ||
- vgpu->vfio_device.kvm->mm != current->mm) {
- gvt_vgpu_err("KVM is required to use Intel vGPU\n");
- return -ESRCH;
- }
-
if (__kvmgt_vgpu_exist(vgpu))
return -EEXIST;
+ vgpu->track_node.track_write = kvmgt_page_track_write;
+ vgpu->track_node.track_remove_region = kvmgt_page_track_remove_region;
+ ret = kvm_page_track_register_notifier(vgpu->vfio_device.kvm,
+ &vgpu->track_node);
+ if (ret) {
+ gvt_vgpu_err("KVM is required to use Intel vGPU\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
vgpu->attached = true;
kvmgt_protect_table_init(vgpu);
gvt_cache_init(vgpu);
- vgpu->track_node.track_write = kvmgt_page_track_write;
- vgpu->track_node.track_remove_region = kvmgt_page_track_remove_region;
- kvm_get_kvm(vgpu->vfio_device.kvm);
- kvm_page_track_register_notifier(vgpu->vfio_device.kvm,
- &vgpu->track_node);
-
debugfs_create_ulong(KVMGT_DEBUGFS_FILENAME, 0444, vgpu->debugfs,
&vgpu->nr_cache_entries);
@@ -730,7 +728,6 @@ static void intel_vgpu_close_device(struct vfio_device *vfio_dev)
kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(vgpu->vfio_device.kvm,
&vgpu->track_node);
- kvm_put_kvm(vgpu->vfio_device.kvm);
kvmgt_protect_table_destroy(vgpu);
gvt_cache_destroy(vgpu);
--
2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists