[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a64e2aea-2e06-a72e-5ced-a86de4458c61@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 15:15:29 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@...data.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 21/21] staging: media: tegra-video: add tegra20 variant
22.12.2022 12:03, Luca Ceresoli пишет:
> Hello Dmitry,
>
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:40:20 +0300
> Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> 28.11.2022 18:23, Luca Ceresoli пишет:
>>> +static int tegra20_channel_capture_frame(struct tegra_vi_channel *chan,
>>> + struct tegra_channel_buffer *buf)
>>> +{
>>> + u32 value;
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + chan->next_out_sp_idx++;
>>> +
>>> + tegra20_channel_vi_buffer_setup(chan, buf);
>>> +
>>> + tegra20_vi_write(chan, TEGRA_VI_CAMERA_CONTROL, VI_CAMERA_CONTROL_VIP_ENABLE);
>>> +
>>> + /* Wait for syncpt counter to reach frame start event threshold */
>>> + err = host1x_syncpt_wait(chan->out_sp, chan->next_out_sp_idx,
>>> + TEGRA_VI_SYNCPT_WAIT_TIMEOUT, &value);
>>
>> You're not using the "value" variable, it should be NULL.
>
> Ah, sure, good catch.
>
>> The "chan->out_sp" looks redundant, it duplicates the chan->mw_ack_sp.
>
> I agree it is redundant and can be improved.
>
>> AFAICS from the doc, T20 has two VI channels, and thus, two mw_ack_sp,
>> like T210.
>
> I'm confused by this. In the current driver, each VI channel has an
> array of 2 mw_ack_sp, the second of which is only used the ganged
> CSI ports. I have no docs mentioning ganged ports so I don't know
> exactly how they work and whether T20 might need more than 1 syncpt per
> channel or not for CSI. Definitely when using VIP only one such syncpt
> per each VI (or per each VIP, as per your reply to patch 1) is needed.
>
> Bottom line: I think I can simply remove the out_sp and in the VIP code
> always use chan->mw_ack_sp[0], and document that it's what is called OUT
> in VIP terms.
>
> Does this plan seem good?
Older Tegra VI doesn't have ganged ports, but two memory/CSI channels.
It feels to me that Tegra VI can capture both channels independently,
though downstream driver stack used only one of the channels, IIRC.
There is a VI header file from nvddk in downstream kernel, which is
pretty much the doc by itself.
https://nv-tegra.nvidia.com/r/gitweb?p=linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/mach-tegra/include/ap20/arvi.h;h=6ce52e8e9a7213e33466d34a71cf3af2b6944b8a;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists