[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221223140312.GA26826@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 15:03:12 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vmalloc: reject vmap with VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 10:24:25AM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> Might it be worth adding a specific vmap mask that explicitly indicates what
> flags are permissible on vmap()? Then this could become e.g.:-
>
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(flags & ~VM_VMAP_PERMITTED_MASK))
> return NULL;
>
> And would be self-documenting as to why we are disallowing flags (i.e. they are
> not part of the permitted vmap mask).
That's probably a good idea. It might need some time to audit
for use of all the flags, though.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists