linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: stable: Add rule on what kind of patches are accepted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <65421f5e-6af7-ac1b-d1ec-209c3e45edac@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Dec 2022 08:55:08 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, sashal@...nel.org, corbet@....net
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joneslee@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: stable: Add rule on what kind of patches
 are accepted

On 12/22/22 20:01, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>> Are there any other examples of problems that can "only" be solved by
>> introducing new features? Or new huge features that are virtually
>> harder to backport?
>>
> 
> Here's an example:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20221222083545.1972489-1-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org/

I have seen that, but is there an answer for the latter question that
I have asked before?

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara