[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y6X1isYeuZMxvDEC@x1n>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 13:38:02 -0500
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@...gle.com>,
Manish Mishra <manish.mishra@...anix.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 34/47] hugetlb: userfaultfd: add support for
high-granularity UFFDIO_CONTINUE
James,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 04:36:50PM +0000, James Houghton wrote:
> + bool use_hgm = uffd_ctx_has_hgm(&dst_vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx) &&
> + mode == MCOPY_ATOMIC_CONTINUE;
Do you think in your new version use_hgm can work even for MISSING by
default?
I had a feeling that the major components are ready for that anyway. Then
no matter how HGM is enabled (assuming it'll switch to MADV, or even one
can just register with MISSING+MINOR and enable the uffd HGM feature), an
existing MISSING only app can easily switch to HGM support if it's on huge
pages.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists