lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 20:29:28 -0500 From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 24/26] writeback: Add asserts for adding freed inode to lists From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> [ Upstream commit a9438b44bc7015b18931e312bbd249a25bb59a65 ] In the past we had several use-after-free issues with inodes getting added to writeback lists after evict() removed them. These are painful to debug so add some asserts to catch the problem earlier. The only non-obvious change in the commit is that we need to tweak redirty_tail_locked() to avoid triggering assertion in inode_io_list_move_locked(). Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221212113633.29181-1-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> --- fs/fs-writeback.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c index 9958d4020771..7ee235680006 100644 --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ static bool inode_io_list_move_locked(struct inode *inode, { assert_spin_locked(&wb->list_lock); assert_spin_locked(&inode->i_lock); + WARN_ON_ONCE(inode->i_state & I_FREEING); list_move(&inode->i_io_list, head); @@ -280,6 +281,7 @@ static void inode_cgwb_move_to_attached(struct inode *inode, { assert_spin_locked(&wb->list_lock); assert_spin_locked(&inode->i_lock); + WARN_ON_ONCE(inode->i_state & I_FREEING); inode->i_state &= ~I_SYNC_QUEUED; if (wb != &wb->bdi->wb) @@ -1129,6 +1131,7 @@ static void inode_cgwb_move_to_attached(struct inode *inode, { assert_spin_locked(&wb->list_lock); assert_spin_locked(&inode->i_lock); + WARN_ON_ONCE(inode->i_state & I_FREEING); inode->i_state &= ~I_SYNC_QUEUED; list_del_init(&inode->i_io_list); @@ -1294,6 +1297,17 @@ static void redirty_tail_locked(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb) { assert_spin_locked(&inode->i_lock); + inode->i_state &= ~I_SYNC_QUEUED; + /* + * When the inode is being freed just don't bother with dirty list + * tracking. Flush worker will ignore this inode anyway and it will + * trigger assertions in inode_io_list_move_locked(). + */ + if (inode->i_state & I_FREEING) { + list_del_init(&inode->i_io_list); + wb_io_lists_depopulated(wb); + return; + } if (!list_empty(&wb->b_dirty)) { struct inode *tail; @@ -1302,7 +1316,6 @@ static void redirty_tail_locked(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb) inode->dirtied_when = jiffies; } inode_io_list_move_locked(inode, wb, &wb->b_dirty); - inode->i_state &= ~I_SYNC_QUEUED; } static void redirty_tail(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb) -- 2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists