[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221226074908.8154-1-jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 15:49:04 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
maxime.coquelin@...hat.com, alvaro.karsz@...id-run.com,
eperezma@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] virtio-net: don't busy poll for cvq command
Hi all:
The code used to busy poll for cvq command which turns out to have
several side effects:
1) infinite poll for buggy devices
2) bad interaction with scheduler
So this series tries to use sleep + timeout instead of busy polling.
Please review.
Thanks
Changes since RFC:
- switch to use BAD_RING in virtio_break_device()
- check virtqueue_is_broken() after being woken up
- use more_used() instead of virtqueue_get_buf() to allow caller to
get buffers afterwards
- break the virtio-net device when timeout
- get buffer manually since the virtio core check more_used() instead
Jason Wang (4):
virtio-net: convert rx mode setting to use workqueue
virtio_ring: switch to use BAD_RING()
virtio_ring: introduce a per virtqueue waitqueue
virtio-net: sleep instead of busy waiting for cvq command
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 37 +++++++++++++--
include/linux/virtio.h | 3 ++
3 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists