[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221226103309.953112-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 18:33:08 +0800
From: Hou Tao <houtao@...weicloud.com>
To: linux-cachefs@...hat.com
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>, houtao1@...wei.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] fscache: Use wait_on_bit() to wait for the freeing of relinquished volume
From: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
The freeing of relinquished volume will wake up the pending volume
acquisition by using wake_up_bit(), however it is mismatched with
wait_var_event() used in fscache_wait_on_volume_collision() and it will
never wake up the waiter in the wait-queue because these two functions
operate on different wait-queues.
According to the implementation in fscache_wait_on_volume_collision(),
if the wake-up of pending acquisition is delayed longer than 20 seconds
(e.g., due to the delay of on-demand fd closing), the first
wait_var_event_timeout() will timeout and the following wait_var_event()
will hang forever as shown below:
FS-Cache: Potential volume collision new=00000024 old=00000022
......
INFO: task mount:1148 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
Not tainted 6.1.0-rc6+ #1
task:mount state:D stack:0 pid:1148 ppid:1
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__schedule+0x2f6/0xb80
schedule+0x67/0xe0
fscache_wait_on_volume_collision.cold+0x80/0x82
__fscache_acquire_volume+0x40d/0x4e0
erofs_fscache_register_volume+0x51/0xe0 [erofs]
erofs_fscache_register_fs+0x19c/0x240 [erofs]
erofs_fc_fill_super+0x746/0xaf0 [erofs]
vfs_get_super+0x7d/0x100
get_tree_nodev+0x16/0x20
erofs_fc_get_tree+0x20/0x30 [erofs]
vfs_get_tree+0x24/0xb0
path_mount+0x2fa/0xa90
do_mount+0x7c/0xa0
__x64_sys_mount+0x8b/0xe0
do_syscall_64+0x30/0x60
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
Considering that wake_up_bit() is more selective, so fixing it by using
wait_on_bit() instead of wait_var_event() to wait for the freeing of
relinquished volume. In addition because waitqueue_active() is used in
wake_up_bit() and clear_bit() doesn't imply any memory barrier, so also
adding smp_mb__after_atomic() before wake_up_bit().
Fixes: 62ab63352350 ("fscache: Implement volume registration")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
---
fs/fscache/volume.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fscache/volume.c b/fs/fscache/volume.c
index ab8ceddf9efa..fc3dd3bc851d 100644
--- a/fs/fscache/volume.c
+++ b/fs/fscache/volume.c
@@ -141,13 +141,14 @@ static bool fscache_is_acquire_pending(struct fscache_volume *volume)
static void fscache_wait_on_volume_collision(struct fscache_volume *candidate,
unsigned int collidee_debug_id)
{
- wait_var_event_timeout(&candidate->flags,
- !fscache_is_acquire_pending(candidate), 20 * HZ);
+ wait_on_bit_timeout(&candidate->flags, FSCACHE_VOLUME_ACQUIRE_PENDING,
+ TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 20 * HZ);
if (fscache_is_acquire_pending(candidate)) {
pr_notice("Potential volume collision new=%08x old=%08x",
candidate->debug_id, collidee_debug_id);
fscache_stat(&fscache_n_volumes_collision);
- wait_var_event(&candidate->flags, !fscache_is_acquire_pending(candidate));
+ wait_on_bit(&candidate->flags, FSCACHE_VOLUME_ACQUIRE_PENDING,
+ TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
}
}
@@ -348,6 +349,11 @@ static void fscache_wake_pending_volume(struct fscache_volume *volume,
if (fscache_volume_same(cursor, volume)) {
fscache_see_volume(cursor, fscache_volume_see_hash_wake);
clear_bit(FSCACHE_VOLUME_ACQUIRE_PENDING, &cursor->flags);
+ /*
+ * Paired with barrier in wait_on_bit(). Check
+ * wake_up_bit() and waitqueue_active() for details.
+ */
+ smp_mb__after_atomic();
wake_up_bit(&cursor->flags, FSCACHE_VOLUME_ACQUIRE_PENDING);
return;
}
--
2.29.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists