[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y6koIrTN2PYpQVGO@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 05:50:42 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Kun-Fa Lin <milkfafa@...il.com>
Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
tony.luck@...el.com, james.morse@....com, mchehab@...nel.org,
rric@...nel.org, benjaminfair@...gle.com, yuenn@...gle.com,
venture@...gle.com, avifishman70@...il.com, tmaimon77@...il.com,
tali.perry1@...il.com, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, KWLIU@...oton.com, YSCHU@...oton.com,
ctcchien@...oton.com, kflin@...oton.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 3/3] EDAC/npcm: Add NPCM memory controller driver
On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 11:50:54AM +0800, Kun-Fa Lin wrote:
> > > + syndrome = priv->location ? 1 << priv->bit :
> > > + data_synd[priv->bit];
> >
> > syndrome = priv->location ? 1 << priv->bit
> > : data_synd[priv->bit];
>
> Just to confirm the indentation, is it right as follows?
>
> syndrome = priv->location ? 1 << priv->bit
> : data_synd[priv->bit];
>
> And I was wondering if I should just remove the line break and let it stick out?
The idea is to have the '?' and the ':' under each other so that one
can visually immediately "parse" where each of the sides of the ternary
statement start.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists