[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d206f87d-2107-7cdb-ee2a-7fe718f06f3d@gnuweeb.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 20:36:41 +0700
From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Gilang Fachrezy <gilang4321@...il.com>,
VNLX Kernel Department <kernel@...x.org>,
Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@...weeb.org>,
Kanna Scarlet <knscarlet@...weeb.org>,
Muhammad Rizki <kiizuha@...weeb.org>,
GNU/Weeb Mailing List <gwml@...r.gnuweeb.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kselftest Mailing List
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] nolibc signal handling support
On 12/27/22 8:32 PM, Ammar Faizi wrote:
>> Thus now my focus will be on storing these variables where relevant
>> for all archs, so that your getauxval() implementation works on top
>> of it. It will be much cleaner and will also improve programs' ease
>> of implementation and reliability.
>
> Are you going to wire up a patchset for it?
>
> If so, I'll wait for it. When it's already committed, I'll base this
> series on top it.
>
> Or I take your series locally then submit your patches and mine in a
> single series.
>
> What do you prefer?
Side note:
I only know x86 Assembly. So unfortunately, I can't get them working
on all arch(s).
--
Ammar Faizi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists