linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] Add multicolor support to BlinkM LED driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Dec 2022 17:02:56 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     Joseph Strauss <jstrauss16@...ton.me>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pavel@....cz,
        jansimon.moeller@....de, christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] Add multicolor support to BlinkM LED driver

Hey Joe,

I thought I replied to Lee's message the other day but obviously forgot
to send it.

On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 04:47:58PM +0000, Joseph Strauss wrote:
> On 22/12/23 12:15PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Dec 2022, Joseph Strauss wrote:
> >
> > Would you mind composing your mails such that my Key Manager doens't ask
> > me for a password in order to view them please?

> I would be happy to, but I am not sure how to diagnose or fix the
> problem. I used git send-email to send the patch. I have no such problem
> when viewing the email from my own client. I looked at the email headers
> and did not see anything out of the ordinary, and the thread shows up
> fine on lore.kernel.org.

> Is there any other information you can provide
> about the problem? Has it happened before?

Unfortunately it has - and it is a protonmail "feature".
kernel.org publishes keys for it's users via WKD:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/maintainer-pgp-guide.html#configure-auto-key-retrieval-using-wkd-and-dane

protonmail, as part of the "back end" or w/e automagically picks up the
keys and uses them to encrypt the message. The list (and people without
WKD set up for their domains) will get the un-encrypted version

When I was a proton user, I could not find a way in the UI to disable
it. I contacted their support at the time who told me it was a feature!

Recently it cropped up again:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221122213754.45474-1-alobakin@mailbox.org/
Unfortunately, the "workaround" was to avoid proton there too.

I was wondering, when I saw Lee's mail, if we should add some sort of
comment about this proton behaviour to process/email-clients..

Conor.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)