linux-kernel - Re: [Patch v3 5/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Allocate TDP page table's page on correct NUMA node on split

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Dec 2022 11:02:35 -0800
From:   Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
To:     Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>
Cc:     seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, dmatlack@...gle.com,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 5/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Allocate TDP page table's page on
 correct NUMA node on split

On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 6:35 PM Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> When dirty log is enabled, huge pages are split. Page table's pages

Nit: Suggest "When huge pages are split for dirty log" since this can
happen at various points during dirty logging.
Same below.

> during the split are allocated based on the current thread NUMA node or
> mempolicy. This causes inefficient page table accesses if underlying
> page is on a different NUMA node
>
> Allocate page table's pages on the same NUMA node as the underlying huge
> page when dirty log is enabled and huge pages are split.
>
> The performance gain during the pre-copy phase of live migrations of a
> 416 vCPUs and 11 TiB memory VM  on a 8 node host was seen in the range
> of 130% to 150%.
>
> Suggested-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 12 ++++++++----
>  include/linux/kvm_host.h   | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> index 4974fa96deff..376b8dceb3f9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> @@ -1403,7 +1403,7 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_wrprot_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
>         return spte_set;
>  }
>
> -static struct kvm_mmu_page *__tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(gfp_t gfp)
> +static struct kvm_mmu_page *__tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(int nid, gfp_t gfp)
>  {
>         struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
>
> @@ -1413,7 +1413,8 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *__tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(gfp_t gfp)
>         if (!sp)
>                 return NULL;
>
> -       sp->spt = (void *)__get_free_page(gfp);
> +       sp->spt = kvm_mmu_get_free_page(nid, gfp);
> +

Just so that kvm_mmu_get_free_page isn't dead code in the previous
commit, I'd do this refactor there and just pass NUMA_NO_NODE here.

>         if (!sp->spt) {
>                 kmem_cache_free(mmu_page_header_cache, sp);
>                 return NULL;
> @@ -1427,6 +1428,9 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(struct kvm *kvm,
>                                                        bool shared)
>  {
>         struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
> +       int nid;
> +
> +       nid = kvm_pfn_to_page_table_nid(spte_to_pfn(iter->old_spte));
>
>         /*
>          * Since we are allocating while under the MMU lock we have to be
> @@ -1437,7 +1441,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(struct kvm *kvm,
>          * If this allocation fails we drop the lock and retry with reclaim
>          * allowed.
>          */
> -       sp = __tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
> +       sp = __tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(nid, GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
>         if (sp)
>                 return sp;
>
> @@ -1449,7 +1453,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(struct kvm *kvm,
>                 write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>
>         iter->yielded = true;
> -       sp = __tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> +       sp = __tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(nid, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
>
>         if (shared)
>                 read_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index d48064503b88..a262e15ebd19 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1583,6 +1583,24 @@ void kvm_arch_sync_events(struct kvm *kvm);
>  int kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
>  struct page *kvm_pfn_to_refcounted_page(kvm_pfn_t pfn);
> +
> +/*
> + * Tells the appropriate NUMA node location of the page table's page based on
> + * pfn it will point to.
> + *
> + * Return the nid of the page if pfn is valid and backed by a refcounted page,
> + * otherwise, return the nearest memory node for the current CPU.

Nit: Should this be "current thread"?

> + */
> +static inline int kvm_pfn_to_page_table_nid(kvm_pfn_t pfn)

This could just be kvm_pfn_nid (or even better kvm_pfn_node_id) since
this really has nothing to do with page tables. We just want to know
which NUMA node backs the given PFN.

> +{
> +       struct page *page = kvm_pfn_to_refcounted_page(pfn);
> +
> +       if (page)
> +               return page_to_nid(page);
> +       else
> +               return numa_mem_id();
> +}
> +
>  bool kvm_is_zone_device_page(struct page *page);
>
>  struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier {
> --
> 2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog
>