linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] virtio_ring: introduce a per virtqueue waitqueue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACGkMEuNZLJRnWw+XNxJ-to1y8L2GrTrJkk0y0Gwb5H2YhDczQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Dec 2022 12:30:35 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        maxime.coquelin@...hat.com, alvaro.karsz@...id-run.com,
        eperezma@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] virtio_ring: introduce a per virtqueue waitqueue

On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 7:38 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 03:49:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > This patch introduces a per virtqueue waitqueue to allow driver to
> > sleep and wait for more used. Two new helpers are introduced to allow
> > driver to sleep and wake up.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > Changes since V1:
> > - check virtqueue_is_broken() as well
> > - use more_used() instead of virtqueue_get_buf() to allow caller to
> >   get buffers afterwards
> > ---
> >  drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/virtio.h       |  3 +++
> >  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > index 5cfb2fa8abee..9c83eb945493 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> >  #include <linux/kmsan.h>
> >  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > +#include <linux/wait.h>
> >  #include <xen/xen.h>
> >
> >  #ifdef DEBUG
> > @@ -60,6 +61,7 @@
> >                       "%s:"fmt, (_vq)->vq.name, ##args);      \
> >               /* Pairs with READ_ONCE() in virtqueue_is_broken(). */ \
> >               WRITE_ONCE((_vq)->broken, true);                       \
> > +             wake_up_interruptible(&(_vq)->wq);                     \
> >       } while (0)
> >  #define START_USE(vq)
> >  #define END_USE(vq)
> > @@ -203,6 +205,9 @@ struct vring_virtqueue {
> >       /* DMA, allocation, and size information */
> >       bool we_own_ring;
> >
> > +     /* Wait for buffer to be used */
> > +     wait_queue_head_t wq;
> > +
> >  #ifdef DEBUG
> >       /* They're supposed to lock for us. */
> >       unsigned int in_use;
> > @@ -2024,6 +2029,8 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_packed(
> >       if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_ORDER_PLATFORM))
> >               vq->weak_barriers = false;
> >
> > +     init_waitqueue_head(&vq->wq);
> > +
> >       err = vring_alloc_state_extra_packed(&vring_packed);
> >       if (err)
> >               goto err_state_extra;
> > @@ -2517,6 +2524,8 @@ static struct virtqueue *__vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned int index,
> >       if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_ORDER_PLATFORM))
> >               vq->weak_barriers = false;
> >
> > +     init_waitqueue_head(&vq->wq);
> > +
> >       err = vring_alloc_state_extra_split(vring_split);
> >       if (err) {
> >               kfree(vq);
> > @@ -2654,6 +2663,8 @@ static void vring_free(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> >  {
> >       struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> >
> > +     wake_up_interruptible(&vq->wq);
> > +
> >       if (vq->we_own_ring) {
> >               if (vq->packed_ring) {
> >                       vring_free_queue(vq->vq.vdev,
> > @@ -2863,4 +2874,22 @@ const struct vring *virtqueue_get_vring(struct virtqueue *vq)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_get_vring);
> >
> > +int virtqueue_wait_for_used(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > +{
> > +     struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> > +
> > +     /* TODO: Tweak the timeout. */
> > +     return wait_event_interruptible_timeout(vq->wq,
> > +            virtqueue_is_broken(_vq) || more_used(vq), HZ);
>
> BTW undocumented that you also make it interruptible.
> So if we get an interrupt then this will fail.

Yes, this is sub-optimal.


> But device is still going and will later use the buffers.
>
> Same for timeout really.

Avoiding infinite wait/poll is one of the goals, another is to sleep.
If we think the timeout is hard, we can start from the wait.

Thanks

>
>
>
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_wait_for_used);
> > +
> > +void virtqueue_wake_up(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > +{
> > +     struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> > +
> > +     wake_up_interruptible(&vq->wq);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_wake_up);
> > +
> >  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio.h b/include/linux/virtio.h
> > index dcab9c7e8784..2eb62c774895 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/virtio.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/virtio.h
> > @@ -72,6 +72,9 @@ void *virtqueue_get_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, unsigned int *len);
> >  void *virtqueue_get_buf_ctx(struct virtqueue *vq, unsigned int *len,
> >                           void **ctx);
> >
> > +int virtqueue_wait_for_used(struct virtqueue *vq);
> > +void virtqueue_wake_up(struct virtqueue *vq);
> > +
> >  void virtqueue_disable_cb(struct virtqueue *vq);
> >
> >  bool virtqueue_enable_cb(struct virtqueue *vq);
> > --
> > 2.25.1
>