lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 28 Dec 2022 10:11:44 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     yanhong wang <yanhong.wang@...rfivetech.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] dt-bindings: net: motorcomm: add support for
 Motorcomm YT8531

On 28/12/2022 04:23, yanhong wang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2022/12/27 17:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 27/12/2022 10:38, yanhong wang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This must be false. After referencing ethernet-phy this should be
>>>> unevaluatedProperties: false.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks. Parts of this patch exist already, after discussion unanimity was achieved,
>>> i will remove the parts of YT8531 in the next version.
>>
>> I don't understand what does it mean. You sent duplicated patch? If so,
>> please do not... you waste reviewers time.
>>
>> Anyway this entire patch does not meet criteria for submission at all,
>> so please start over from example-schema.
>>
> 
> Sorry, maybe I didn't make it clear, which led to misunderstanding. Motorcomm Inc is also 
> carrying out the upstream of YT8531, and my patch will be duplicated and conflicted 
> with their submission. By communicating with the developers of Motorcomm Inc, the part 
> of YT8531 will be submitted by Motorcomm Inc, so my submission about YT8531 will be withdrawn.

Are they going to apply the feedback received for this series?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists