linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] dt-bindings: net: motorcomm: add support for Motorcomm YT8531

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9b098bf9-59d7-e58d-aba3-a8055af053c6@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 28 Dec 2022 10:11:44 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     yanhong wang <yanhong.wang@...rfivetech.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] dt-bindings: net: motorcomm: add support for
 Motorcomm YT8531

On 28/12/2022 04:23, yanhong wang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2022/12/27 17:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 27/12/2022 10:38, yanhong wang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This must be false. After referencing ethernet-phy this should be
>>>> unevaluatedProperties: false.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks. Parts of this patch exist already, after discussion unanimity was achieved,
>>> i will remove the parts of YT8531 in the next version.
>>
>> I don't understand what does it mean. You sent duplicated patch? If so,
>> please do not... you waste reviewers time.
>>
>> Anyway this entire patch does not meet criteria for submission at all,
>> so please start over from example-schema.
>>
> 
> Sorry, maybe I didn't make it clear, which led to misunderstanding. Motorcomm Inc is also 
> carrying out the upstream of YT8531, and my patch will be duplicated and conflicted 
> with their submission. By communicating with the developers of Motorcomm Inc, the part 
> of YT8531 will be submitted by Motorcomm Inc, so my submission about YT8531 will be withdrawn.

Are they going to apply the feedback received for this series?

Best regards,
Krzysztof