linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/17] Qcom: LLCC/EDAC: Fix base address used for LLCC banks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y6wcFjqpBUoxAkdk@zn.tnic>
Date:   Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:36:06 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc:     andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
        quic_saipraka@...cinc.com, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        james.morse@....com, mchehab@...nel.org, rric@...nel.org,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, quic_ppareek@...cinc.com,
        luca.weiss@...rphone.com, ahalaney@...hat.com, steev@...i.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/17] Qcom: LLCC/EDAC: Fix base address used for LLCC
 banks

On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 02:10:11PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Patches 1/17, 2/17 and 3/17 can be merged independently to EDAC tree. Rest of
> the patches should be merged to qcom tree due to LLCC dependency.

Why make it more complicated than it has to be?

How about I review the EDAC bits and once they look ok, whoever takes
care of the qcom tree can pick them up too and route the whole pile
through there?

This way there's no needless dependency between trees...

Hmm.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette