linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: add missing core_bi_pll_test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 28 Dec 2022 12:55:12 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: add missing
 core_bi_pll_test_se GCC clock

On 28/12/2022 12:37, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 28.12.2022 12:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The GCC bindings expect core_bi_pll_test_se clock input, even if it is
>> optional:
>>
>>   sm8350-mtp.dtb: clock-controller@...000: clock-names:2: 'core_bi_pll_test_se' was expected
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> ---
> Is it even going to be used by anybody, or should we just drop
> it on the driver side as per usual?

It's mentioned as possible parent, so there might be users somewhere...
Or you want to say that other binding and DTS users cannot use that clock?

Best regards,
Krzysztof