linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add reg-names property for ICE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5391e6e5-3773-a012-c396-b59b1f54ea51@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 28 Dec 2022 12:58:29 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add reg-names property for ICE

On 28/12/2022 12:53, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Wed Dec 28, 2022 at 12:50 PM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 09/12/2022 15:29, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>> The code in ufs-qcom-ice.c needs the ICE reg to be named "ice". Add this
>>> in the bindings so the existing dts can validate successfully.
>>>
>>> Also sm8450 is using ICE since commit 276ee34a40c1 ("arm64: dts: qcom:
>>> sm8450: add Inline Crypto Engine registers and clock") so move the
>>> compatible to the correct if.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
>>> ---
>>> (no cover subject)
>>>
>>> The only remaining validation issues I see is the following on sc8280xp-crd.dtb
>>> and sa8540p-ride.dtb:
>>>
>>
>> Any plans on fixing the patch (after testing it) and resending?
> 
> I wasn't quite sure how to fix the comments, but re-reading them this
> comment from you is how you expect it to be in v2?

The patch fails testing, so I meant this.

> 
>> Just add it to top-level with minItems: 1 and per variant customize:
>> 1. maxItems: 1
>> 2. minItems: 2 + required
> 

Yes.

Best regards,
Krzysztof