[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mafs0zgb7boba.fsf@amazon.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 15:22:33 +0100
From: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@...zon.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI: processor: perflib: Use the "no limit"
frequency QoS
On Tue, Dec 27 2022, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> When _PPC returns 0, it means that the CPU frequency is not limited by
> the platform firmware, so make acpi_processor_get_platform_limit()
> update the frequency QoS request used by it to "no limit" in that case
> and avoid updating the QoS request when the _PPC return value has not
> changed.
>
> This addresses a problem with limiting CPU frequency artificially on
> some systems after CPU offline/online to the frequency that corresponds
> to the first entry in the _PSS return package.
>
> While at it, move the _PPC return value check against the state count
> earlier to avoid setting performance_platform_limit to an invalid value.
>
> Reported-by: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@...zon.de>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Tested-by: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@...zon.de>
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
Krausenstr. 38
10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Christian Schlaeger, Jonathan Weiss
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg unter HRB 149173 B
Sitz: Berlin
Ust-ID: DE 289 237 879
Powered by blists - more mailing lists