linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: add missing core_bi_pll_test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 28 Dec 2022 16:34:56 +0200
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: add missing
 core_bi_pll_test_se GCC clock

On 28/12/2022 16:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/12/2022 13:50, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 28/12/2022 13:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 28/12/2022 12:37, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 28.12.2022 12:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> The GCC bindings expect core_bi_pll_test_se clock input, even if it is
>>>>> optional:
>>>>>
>>>>>     sm8350-mtp.dtb: clock-controller@...000: clock-names:2: 'core_bi_pll_test_se' was expected
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>> Is it even going to be used by anybody, or should we just drop
>>>> it on the driver side as per usual?
>>>
>>> It's mentioned as possible parent, so there might be users somewhere...
>>> Or you want to say that other binding and DTS users cannot use that clock?
>>
>> Yes. In the past few months we have been removing the core_bi_pll_test
>> from the old clock drivers (and new clock drivers mostly lack them).
>> Let's remove it from the rest of clock drivers.
> 
> If you are going to start doing the same work, please at least share it
> upfront.

Excuse me.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry