linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: ti: Add new compatible for AM62 SoC family

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f1d07761-9ead-7275-30f0-34a10f012dd8@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 28 Dec 2022 16:03:48 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@...com>, andersson@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
        p.zabel@...gutronix.de, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, s-anna@...com
Cc:     hnagalla@...com, praneeth@...com, nm@...com, vigneshr@...com,
        a-bhatia1@...com, j-luthra@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: ti: Add new compatible
 for AM62 SoC family

On 27/12/2022 15:52, Devarsh Thakkar wrote:
> AM62 family of devices don't have a R5F cluster, instead
> they have single core DM R5F.
> Add new compatible string ti,am62-r5fss to support this scenario.
> 
> When this new compatible is used don't allow cluster-mode
> property usage in device-tree as this implies that there
> is no R5F cluster available and only single R5F core
> is present.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@...com>
> ---
> V2: Avoid acronyms, use "Device Manager" instead of "DM"
> V3:
> - Use separate if block for each compatible for ti,cluster-mode property
> - Rearrange compatibles as per alphabatical order
> V4: Place each enum in separate line in allOf
> V5: No change (fixing typo in email address)


Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof