linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 0000/1146] 6.1.2-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 28 Dec 2022 12:38:54 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 0000/1146] 6.1.2-rc1 review

On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 07:10:59AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 03:25:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.2 release.
>> There are 1146 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Fri, 30 Dec 2022 14:41:29 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>
>Building arm:allmodconfig ... failed
>Building arm64:allmodconfig ... failed
>--------------
>Error log:
>drivers/mfd/qcom_rpm.c: In function 'qcom_rpm_remove':
>drivers/mfd/qcom_rpm.c:680:26: error: unused variable 'rpm' [-Werror=unused-variable]
>  680 |         struct qcom_rpm *rpm = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
>
>36579aca877a ("mfd: qcom_rpm: Fix an error handling path in qcom_rpm_probe()")
>was applied without e48dee960462 ("mfd: qcom_rpm: Use
>devm_of_platform_populate() to simplify code") which fixes the problem
>without saying that it does.
>
>The problem affects v5.15.y and v6.0.y as well.

I've queued up 36579aca877a, thanks for looking into it!

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha