linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/17] Qcom: LLCC/EDAC: Fix base address used for LLCC banks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y6yDI43UZYfGDuOm@zn.tnic>
Date:   Wed, 28 Dec 2022 18:55:47 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc:     andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
        quic_saipraka@...cinc.com, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        james.morse@....com, mchehab@...nel.org, rric@...nel.org,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, quic_ppareek@...cinc.com,
        luca.weiss@...rphone.com, ahalaney@...hat.com, steev@...i.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/17] Qcom: LLCC/EDAC: Fix base address used for LLCC
 banks

On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 10:17:11PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Well, some maintainers prefer to pick the independent patches through their
> tree. That's why I moved those patches to the start of the series.

Once some maintainers experience a crazy dependency hell between trees,
they would find routing it all through a single tree a lot easier the
next time.

> If you are fine with all patches going through qcom tree, I do not
> have any issue :)

I'm reviewing.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette