[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <03cb5a7d-a10a-91b0-9e10-6a1147e56963@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 15:27:19 +0900
From: Soichiro Ueda <the.latticeheart@...il.com>
To: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>, mst@...hat.com,
david@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kalutes@...gle.com, mhiramat@...nel.org, cwd@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_balloon: high order allocation
Hi, Shixin.
Thanks for checking the patch!
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_pfns; i++) {
>> + set_page_pfns(vb, vb->pfns + vb->num_pfns + i,
>> + nth_page(page, i));
>> + }
> Since the interval of vb->num_pfns is VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE,
> it seems that the pfns[] should be vb->pfns + vb->num_pfns + i * VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE.
Definitely.
>> + vb->num_pages +=
>> + num_pfns * VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE;
>> + if (!virtio_has_feature(
>> + vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_DEFLATE_ON_OOM))
>> + adjust_managed_page_count(page, -num_pfns);
> num_pfns is of the unsigned int type so need be to converted to long manually.
Oh, the second argument of adjust_managed_page_count is long type. So it
needs casting as you say.
I'll fix these problems in the v2 patch.
Thank you,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists