[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y62CozIJ/aY2Tr7z@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 13:05:55 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
Cc: hpa@...or.com, kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com,
wei.liu@...nel.org, decui@...rosoft.com, luto@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, arnd@...db.de,
hch@...radead.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com,
thomas.lendacky@....com, brijesh.singh@....com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
isaku.yamahata@...el.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
jane.chu@...cle.com, seanjc@...gle.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 03/13] Drivers: hv: Explicitly request decrypted in
vmap_pfn() calls
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 07:30:21PM -0800, Michael Kelley wrote:
> In preparation for a subsequent patch,
Yeah, once those are all in git, the concept of "subsequent patch"
becomes ambiguous depending on how you're sorting them. So try to read
that commit message out of the context of all those "subsequent patches"
and see if it still makes sense.
IOW, you should strive for your commit messages to make sense on their
own, without referencing other patches. If possible, that is.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists