linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v3 3/4] mm, printk: introduce new format %pGt for page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Dec 2022 22:35:37 +0900
From:   Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
        HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) 
        <naoya.horiguchi@....com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Matthew WilCox <willy@...radead.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 3/4] mm, printk: introduce new format %pGt for page_type

On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 12:58:53PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 11:35:38AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 12/19/22 01:44, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 07:19:00PM +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > #define DEF_PAGETYPE_NAME(_name)	{ PG_##_name, __stringify(_name) }
> > > ...
> > > #undef DEF_PAGETYPE_MASK
> > > 
> > > In this case it decreases the chances of typo in the strings and flags.
> > 
> > I'd say Yes.  (and #undef DEF_PAGETYPE_NAME methinks; or change both to _MASK)
> 
> Ah, it's me who used two different names for the same macro :-)

It seems like a good way to make fewer mistakes.
Will do in next version, thanks! :-)

-- 
Thanks,
Hyeonggon