linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH Part2 v6 07/49] x86/sev: Invalid pages from direct map when adding it to RMP table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y63Jz01c7zLx03gQ@zn.tnic>
Date:   Thu, 29 Dec 2022 18:09:35 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@....com>
Cc:     Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        jroedel@...e.de, thomas.lendacky@....com, hpa@...or.com,
        ardb@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
        vkuznets@...hat.com, jmattson@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, slp@...hat.com, pgonda@...gle.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
        rientjes@...gle.com, dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com, tobin@....com,
        vbabka@...e.cz, kirill@...temov.name, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        tony.luck@...el.com, marcorr@...gle.com,
        sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, alpergun@...gle.com,
        dgilbert@...hat.com, jarkko@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part2 v6 07/49] x86/sev: Invalid pages from direct map
 when adding it to RMP table

On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 03:49:39PM -0600, Kalra, Ashish wrote:
> Milan onward,

And before ML there's no SNP, right?

> there is H/W support for coherency between mappings of the
> same physical page with different encryption keys, so AFAIK, there should be
> no need to flush during page state transitions, where we invoke these direct
> map interface functions for re-mapping/invalidating pages.

Yah, that rings a bell.

In any case, the fact that flushing is not needed should be stated
somewhere in text so that it is clear why.

> I don't know if there is any other reason to flush after modifying
> the direct map ?

There's

        /*
         * No need to flush, when we did not set any of the caching
         * attributes:
         */
        cache = !!pgprot2cachemode(mask_set);


Does the above HW cover this case too?

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette