[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f67f507-806b-d7d0-ed69-077f5c59f0ff@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 10:57:29 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Cixi Geng <cixi.geng@...ux.dev>, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
brgl@...ev.pl, orsonzhai@...il.com, zhang.lyra@...il.com
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cixi.geng1@...soc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] gpio: gpio-pmic-eic-sprd: Make the irqchip
immutable
On 12/28/2022 8:24 PM, Cixi Geng wrote:
> From: Cixi Geng <cixi.geng1@...soc.com>
>
> Remove the irq_chip from pmic_eic structure,
> use the various calls by defining the statically
> irq_chip structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cixi Geng <cixi.geng1@...soc.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> index e518490c4b68..add15416f7a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ enum {
> /**
> * struct sprd_pmic_eic - PMIC EIC controller
> * @chip: the gpio_chip structure.
> - * @intc: the irq_chip structure.
> * @map: the regmap from the parent device.
> * @offset: the EIC controller's offset address of the PMIC.
> * @reg: the array to cache the EIC registers.
> @@ -56,7 +55,6 @@ enum {
> */
> struct sprd_pmic_eic {
> struct gpio_chip chip;
> - struct irq_chip intc;
> struct regmap *map;
> u32 offset;
> u8 reg[CACHE_NR_REGS];
> @@ -151,15 +149,21 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
> {
> struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
Please keep the same coding style in this driver:
u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
>
> pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 0;
> pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 0;
> +
> + gpiochip_disable_irq(chip, hwirq);
> }
>
> static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
> {
> struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
Ditto
> +
> + gpiochip_enable_irq(chip, hwirq);
>
> pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 1;
> pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 1;
> @@ -292,6 +296,17 @@ static irqreturn_t sprd_pmic_eic_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> +static const struct irq_chip pmic_eic_irq_chip = {
> + .name = "sprd-pmic-eic-gpio",
Should be 'sprd-pmic-eic'.
With above fixes, you can add
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> + .irq_mask = sprd_pmic_eic_irq_mask,
> + .irq_unmask = sprd_pmic_eic_irq_unmask,
> + .irq_set_type = sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type,
> + .irq_bus_lock = sprd_pmic_eic_bus_lock,
> + .irq_bus_sync_unlock = sprd_pmic_eic_bus_sync_unlock,
> + .flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE | IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE,
> + GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
> +};
> +
> static int sprd_pmic_eic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct gpio_irq_chip *irq;
> @@ -338,16 +353,8 @@ static int sprd_pmic_eic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pmic_eic->chip.set = sprd_pmic_eic_set;
> pmic_eic->chip.get = sprd_pmic_eic_get;
>
> - pmic_eic->intc.name = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
> - pmic_eic->intc.irq_mask = sprd_pmic_eic_irq_mask;
> - pmic_eic->intc.irq_unmask = sprd_pmic_eic_irq_unmask;
> - pmic_eic->intc.irq_set_type = sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type;
> - pmic_eic->intc.irq_bus_lock = sprd_pmic_eic_bus_lock;
> - pmic_eic->intc.irq_bus_sync_unlock = sprd_pmic_eic_bus_sync_unlock;
> - pmic_eic->intc.flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE;
> -
> irq = &pmic_eic->chip.irq;
> - irq->chip = &pmic_eic->intc;
> + gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(irq, &pmic_eic_irq_chip);
> irq->threaded = true;
>
> ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &pmic_eic->chip, pmic_eic);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists