[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y637aBTrbRloUtvD@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 22:41:12 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Cc: matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com, hao.wu@...el.com,
yilun.xu@...el.com, russell.h.weight@...el.com,
basheer.ahmed.muddebihal@...el.com, mdf@...nel.org,
linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tianfei.zhang@...el.com,
corbet@....net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
geert+renesas@...der.be, niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se,
macro@...am.me.uk, johan@...nel.org, lukas@...ner.de,
ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, marpagan@...hat.com,
bagasdotme@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/4] fpga: dfl: add basic support for DFHv1
On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 08:18:03AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 12/28/22 10:16 AM, matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com wrote:
...
> > struct dfl_feature_info {
> > u16 fid;
> > u8 revision;
> > + u8 dfh_version;
> > struct resource mmio_res;
> > void __iomem *ioaddr;
> > struct list_head node;
> > unsigned int irq_base;
> > unsigned int nr_irqs;
> > + unsigned int param_size;
> > + u64 params[];
> u64 *params
This will break the overflow.h macros, no?
Besides that it will break the code for sure as it's not an equivalent.
> > };
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists