lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 11:00:52 +0100 From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info> To: nickel@...linux.org Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Obidin <obidinog@...ealt.ru>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ASoC: soc-pcm: Don't zero TDM masks in __soc_pcm_open()" On 30.12.22 10:53, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 12:30:53PM +0300, nickel@...linux.org wrote: >> From: Nikolai Kostrigin <nickel@...linux.org> >> >> This reverts commit c34db0d6b88b1da95e7ab3353e674f4f574cccee. >> >> Sudden sound disappearance was reported for some laptops, e.g. >> Acer Swift 3 SF314-59-78UR 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1165G7 @ 2.80GHz >> >> lspci >> 0000:00:1f.3 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP Smart Sound Technology Audio Controller (rev 20) >> Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device 148c >> Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 32, IRQ 197, IOMMU group 12 >> Memory at 601f270000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] >> Memory at 601f000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1M] >> Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 3 >> Capabilities: [80] Vendor Specific Information: Len=14 <?> >> Capabilities: [60] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+ >> Kernel driver in use: sof-audio-pci >> >> Bisection revealed the commit being reverted. >> >> Reported-by: Oleg Obidin <obidinog@...ealt.ru> >> Link: https://bugzilla.altlinux.org/44690 >> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216861 >> Signed-off-by: Nikolai Kostrigin <nickel@...linux.org> >> --- >> sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > <formletter> > > This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the > stable kernel tree. Please read: > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html > for how to do this properly. > > </formletter> Also FWIW & FYI: I earlier today brought the regression in question to the attention of the people that are responsible to fix this issue: https://lore.kernel.org/all/bebd692d-7d21-6648-6b7a-c91063bb51c2@leemhuis.info/ With a bit of luck they will soon look into this and fix it, but given the time of year it might take a day or two longer than usual... Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists