linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 2/2] sched: Use kfree_rcu() in do_set_cpus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221230153218.354214-3-longman@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Dec 2022 10:32:18 -0500
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Cc:     Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
        Wenjie Li <wenjieli@....qualcomm.com>,
        David Wang 王标 
        <wangbiao3@...omi.com>, Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] sched: Use kfree_rcu() in do_set_cpus_allowed()

Commit 851a723e45d1 ("sched: Always clear user_cpus_ptr in
do_set_cpus_allowed()") may call kfree() if user_cpus_ptr was previously
set. Unfortunately, some of the callers of do_set_cpus_allowed()
may have pi_lock held when calling it. So the following splats may be
printed especially when running with a PREEMPT_RT kernel:

   WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
   BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context

To avoid these problems, kfree_rcu() is used instead. An internal
cpumask_rcuhead union is created for the sole purpose of facilitating
the use of kfree_rcu() to free the cpumask.

Fixes: 851a723e45d1 ("sched: Always clear user_cpus_ptr in do_set_cpus_allowed()")
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index b93d030b9fd5..31a14650bd7e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2604,9 +2604,29 @@ void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask)
 		.user_mask = NULL,
 		.flags     = SCA_USER,	/* clear the user requested mask */
 	};
+	union cpumask_rcuhead {
+		cpumask_t cpumask;
+		struct rcu_head rcu;
+	};
 
 	__do_set_cpus_allowed(p, &ac);
-	kfree(ac.user_mask);
+
+	/*
+	 * Because this is called with p->pi_lock held, it is not possible
+	 * to use kfree() here (when PREEMPT_RT=y), therefore punt to using
+	 * kfree_rcu().
+	 */
+	kfree_rcu((union cpumask_rcuhead *)ac.user_mask, rcu);
+}
+
+static cpumask_t *alloc_user_cpus_ptr(int node)
+{
+	/*
+	 * See do_set_cpus_allowed() above for the rcu_head usage.
+	 */
+	int size = max_t(int, cpumask_size(), sizeof(struct rcu_head));
+
+	return kmalloc_node(size, GFP_KERNEL, node);
 }
 
 int dup_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src,
@@ -2629,7 +2649,7 @@ int dup_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src,
 	if (data_race(!src->user_cpus_ptr))
 		return 0;
 
-	user_mask = kmalloc_node(cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL, node);
+	user_mask = alloc_user_cpus_ptr(node);
 	if (!user_mask)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -8263,7 +8283,7 @@ long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask)
 	if (retval)
 		goto out_put_task;
 
-	user_mask = kmalloc(cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL);
+	user_mask = alloc_user_cpus_ptr(NUMA_NO_NODE);
 	if (!user_mask) {
 		retval = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out_put_task;
-- 
2.31.1