[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221230160103.250996-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 17:00:57 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: remove GCC from CX power domain
Bindings do not allow power-domain property in GCC clock controller and
documentation does not indicate that GCC is part of VDD_CX.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
---
Maybe the bindings should be fixed? Maybe this was added as workaround?
Anyway looking at documentation I do not see such relation, except
downstream vdd_cx-supply (which is the same as in other SoCs and we do
not represent it in upstream).
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
index 1d1420c8720c..d14663c9f34c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
@@ -799,7 +799,6 @@ gcc: clock-controller@...000 {
<&pcie4_phy>,
<0>,
<0>;
- power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_CX>;
};
ipcc: mailbox@...000 {
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists