[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQ+7vwr95vXME=9YyRyBA60Num-1-Btm+__5q7t1NwU3YA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 19:20:16 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Xin Liu <liuxin350@...wei.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
yanan@...wei.com, wuchangye@...wei.com, xiesongyang@...wei.com,
kongweibin2@...wei.com, zhangmingyi5@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: fix errno is overwritten after being closed.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 3:21 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 1:49 PM Alexei Starovoitov
> <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 1:44 PM Andrii Nakryiko
> > <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 5:36 AM Xin Liu <liuxin350@...wei.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In the ensure_good_fd function, if the fcntl function succeeds but
> > > > the close function fails, ensure_good_fd returns a normal fd and
> > > > sets errno, which may cause users to misunderstand. The close
> > > > failure is not a serious problem, and the correct FD has been
> > > > handed over to the upper-layer application. Let's restore errno here.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Xin Liu <liuxin350@...wei.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 5 ++---
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> > > > index 377642ff51fc..98333a6c38e9 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> > > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> > > > @@ -543,10 +543,9 @@ static inline int ensure_good_fd(int fd)
> > > > fd = fcntl(fd, F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC, 3);
> > > > saved_errno = errno;
> > > > close(old_fd);
> > > > - if (fd < 0) {
> > > > + errno = saved_errno;
> > > > + if (fd < 0)
> > > > pr_warn("failed to dup FD %d to FD > 2: %d\n", old_fd, -saved_errno);
> > > > - errno = saved_errno;
> > >
> > > pr_warn calls into user-provided callback, which can clobber errno, so
> > > `errno = saved_errno` should happen after pr_warn. With your change
> > > there is even higher chance of errno clobbering.
> > >
> > > Please send a follow up fix to unconditionally restore errno *after*
> > > pr_warn, thanks.
> >
> > Good point. I can follow up with one line fix too.
>
> that would be simplest, probably, thanks!
Pushed trivial fix to bpf-next.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists