linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH qemu] x86: don't let decompressed kernel image clobber setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 30 Dec 2022 19:30:58 +0100
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     pbonzini@...hat.com, ebiggers@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
        ardb@...nel.org, kraxel@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, bp@...en8.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH qemu] x86: don't let decompressed kernel image clobber
 setup_data

On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 03:38:30PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> The setup_data links are appended to the compressed kernel image. Since
> the kernel image is typically loaded at 0x100000, setup_data lives at
> `0x100000 + compressed_size`, which does not get relocated during the
> kernel's boot process.
> 
> The kernel typically decompresses the image starting at address
> 0x1000000 (note: there's one more zero there than the decompressed image
> above). This usually is fine for most kernels.
> 
> However, if the compressed image is actually quite large, then
> setup_data will live at a `0x100000 + compressed_size` that extends into
> the decompressed zone at 0x1000000. In other words, if compressed_size
> is larger than `0x1000000 - 0x100000`, then the decompression step will
> clobber setup_data, resulting in crashes.
> 
> Fix this by detecting that possibility, and if it occurs, put setup_data
> *after* the end of the decompressed kernel, so that it doesn't get
> clobbered.
> 
> One caveat is that this only works for images less than around 64
> megabytes, so just bail out in that case. This is unfortunate, but I
> don't currently have a way of fixing it.
 
I've got a different solution now that tries to piggy back on cmdline.
I'll send a v2. It avoids the 62MiB crash situation of this one and
seems to work fine.