[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221230042014.154483-3-ruscur@russell.cc>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 15:20:09 +1100
From: Russell Currey <ruscur@...sell.cc>
To: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, gcwilson@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nayna@...ux.ibm.com,
ajd@...ux.ibm.com, zohar@...ux.ibm.com, mpe@...erman.id.au,
Russell Currey <ruscur@...sell.cc>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/7] powerpc/secvar: WARN_ON_ONCE() if multiple secvar ops are set
The secvar code only supports one consumer at a time.
Multiple consumers aren't possible at this point in time, but we'd want
it to be obvious if it ever could happen.
Signed-off-by: Russell Currey <ruscur@...sell.cc>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/secvar-ops.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/secvar-ops.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/secvar-ops.c
index 6a29777d6a2d..aa1b2adc2710 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/secvar-ops.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/secvar-ops.c
@@ -8,10 +8,12 @@
#include <linux/cache.h>
#include <asm/secvar.h>
+#include <asm/bug.h>
-const struct secvar_operations *secvar_ops __ro_after_init;
+const struct secvar_operations *secvar_ops __ro_after_init = NULL;
void set_secvar_ops(const struct secvar_operations *ops)
{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(secvar_ops);
secvar_ops = ops;
}
--
2.38.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists