lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y69h6ur79SMhu61F@zx2c4.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Dec 2022 23:10:50 +0100
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        ebiggers@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        qemu-devel@...gnu.org, ardb@...nel.org, kraxel@...hat.com,
        philmd@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH qemu] x86: don't let decompressed kernel image clobber
 setup_data

On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 01:58:39PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> See the other thread fork. They have identified the problem already.

Not sure I follow. Is there another thread where somebody worked out why
this 62meg limit was happening?

Note that I sent v2/v3, to fix the original problem in a different way,
and if that looks good to the QEMU maintainers, then we can all be happy
with that. But I *haven't* addressed and still don't fully understand
why the 62meg limit applied to my v1 in the way it does. Did you find a
bug there to fix? If so, please do CC me.

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ