linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 06/23] clk: mediatek: clk-mux: Propagate struct device for mtk-mux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXv+5FPDxxSd54478+6t0r9P7ytFYn7u6H3ezi4jYU=0R2CpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Dec 2022 12:43:45 +0800
From:   Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
To:     AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc:     mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        johnson.wang@...iatek.com, miles.chen@...iatek.com,
        fparent@...libre.com, chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com,
        sam.shih@...iatek.com, y.oudjana@...tonmail.com,
        nfraprado@...labora.com, rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com,
        ryder.lee@...nel.org, daniel@...rotopia.org,
        jose.exposito89@...il.com, yangyingliang@...wei.com,
        pablo.sun@...iatek.com, msp@...libre.com, weiyi.lu@...iatek.com,
        ikjn@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/23] clk: mediatek: clk-mux: Propagate struct device
 for mtk-mux

On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 5:43 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Like done for other clocks, propagate struct device for mtk mux clocks
> registered through clk-mux helpers to enable runtime pm support.
>
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>

Same comment as the previous patches, could we move struct device
to the first parameter?

Otherwise this looks good to me.

ChenYu