lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221231150501.123205-1-007047221b@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 31 Dec 2022 16:05:01 +0100
From:   Tanmay Bhushan <007047221b@...il.com>
To:     Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Tanmay Bhushan <007047221b@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: Fix ASSERT of em->len when getting extent

em->len is incorrectly asserted which is leading to it's
assignment to sectorsize instead of being check for it.

Signed-off-by: Tanmay Bhushan <007047221b@...il.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 8bcad9940154..e49358048a98 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -7092,7 +7092,7 @@ struct extent_map *btrfs_get_extent(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
 		 * Other members are not utilized for inline extents.
 		 */
 		ASSERT(em->block_start == EXTENT_MAP_INLINE);
-		ASSERT(em->len = fs_info->sectorsize);
+		ASSERT(em->len == fs_info->sectorsize);
 
 		ret = read_inline_extent(inode, path, page);
 		if (ret < 0)
-- 
2.34.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ