[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2023 22:13:14 +0530
From: Siddh Raman Pant <code@...dh.me>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Seth Forshee <sforshee@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kselftests <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mount_setattr: Remove redefinition of struct
mount_attr
On Sun, 11 Dec 2022 14:58:20 +0530, Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
> It is already included via sys/mount.h on line 10.
>
> GCC error reproducible by: make kselftest TARGETS="mount_setattr"
>
> mount_setattr_test.c:107:8: error: redefinition of ‘struct mount_attr’
> 107 | struct mount_attr {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys/mount.h:32,
> from mount_setattr_test.c:10:
> ../../../../usr/include/linux/mount.h:129:8: note: originally defined here
> 129 | struct mount_attr {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
>
> Signed-off-by: Siddh Raman Pant <code@...dh.me>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mount_setattr/mount_setattr_test.c | 7 -------
> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mount_setattr/mount_setattr_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mount_setattr/mount_setattr_test.c
> index 8c5fea68ae67..582669ca38e9 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mount_setattr/mount_setattr_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mount_setattr/mount_setattr_test.c
> @@ -103,13 +103,6 @@
> #else
> #define __NR_mount_setattr 442
> #endif
> -
> -struct mount_attr {
> - __u64 attr_set;
> - __u64 attr_clr;
> - __u64 propagation;
> - __u64 userns_fd;
> -};
> #endif
>
> #ifndef __NR_open_tree
> --
> 2.35.1
Hi,
Please review the above patch, which can be found on the link below:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221211092820.85527-1-code@siddh.me
This was encountered before the patch adding missing <sys/syscall.h>
was applied, which just means that I went into the code path under
#ifndef __NR_mount_setattr, and encountered the error.
Thanks,
Siddh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists