lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAEXW_YQyieW+w-VJ48N5kMkQo-RzJhFXD2kBR91B0KqhVFJNbw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2023 01:20:01 -0500 From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] torture: Fix hang during kthread shutdown phase On Sun, Jan 1, 2023 at 1:16 AM Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote: > > During shutdown of rcutorture, the shutdown thread in > rcu_torture_cleanup() calls torture_cleanup_begin() which sets fullstop > to FULLSTOP_RMMOD. This is enough to cause the rcutorture threads for > readers and fakewriters to breakout of their main while loop and start > shutting down. > > Once out of their main loop, they then call torture_kthread_stopping() > which in turn waits for kthread_stop() to be called, however > rcu_torture_cleanup() has not even called kthread_stop() on those > threads yet, it does that a bit later. However, before it gets a chance > to do so, torture_kthread_stopping() calls > schedule_timeout_interruptible(1) in a tight loop. Tracing confirmed > this makes the timer softirq constantly execute timer callbacks, while > never returning back to the softirq exit path and is essentially "locked > up" because of that. If the softirq preempts the shutdown thread, > kthread_stop() may never be called. > > This commit improves the situation dramatically, by increasing timeout > passed to schedule_timeout_interruptible() 1/20th of a second. This > causes the timer softirq to not lock up a CPU and everything works fine. > Testing has shown 100 runs of TREE07 passing reliably, which was not the > case before because of RCU stalls. > > Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> > Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> > Cc: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 6.0.x Question for stable maintainers: This patch is for mainline and 6.0 stable. However, it should also go to 6.1 stable. How do we tag it to do that? I did not know how to tag 2 stable versions. I guess the above implies > 6.0 ? Thanks, - Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists