linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] igc: Mask replay rollover/timeout errors in I225

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 1 Jan 2023 11:32:16 +0100
From:   Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To:     Rajat Khandelwal <rajat.khandelwal@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rajat.khandelwal@...el.com, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] igc: Mask replay rollover/timeout
 errors in I225_LMVP

[Cc: +Bjorn, +linux-pci]


Dear Rajat,


Thank you for your patch.

Am 29.12.22 um 13:26 schrieb Rajat Khandelwal:
> The CPU logs get flooded with replay rollover/timeout AER errors in
> the system with i225_lmvp connected, usually inside thunderbolt devices.

Please add one example log message to the commit message.

> One of the prominent TBT4 docks we use is HP G4 Hook2, which incorporates

I couldn’t find that device. Is that the correct name?

> an Intel Foxville chipset, which uses the igc driver.

Please add a blank line between paragraphs.

> On connecting ethernet, CPU logs get inundated with these errors. The point
> is we shouldn't be spamming the logs with such correctible errors as it

correctable

> confuses other kernel developers less familiar with PCI errors, support
> staff, and users who happen to look at the logs.

Please reference the bug reports (bug tracker and mailing list), you 
know of, where this was reported.

> Signed-off-by: Rajat Khandelwal <rajat.khandelwal@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> index ebff0e04045d..a3a6e8086c8d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> @@ -6201,6 +6201,26 @@ u32 igc_rd32(struct igc_hw *hw, u32 reg)
>   	return value;
>   }
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCIEAER
> +static void igc_mask_aer_replay_correctible(struct igc_adapter *adapter)

correctable

> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> +	u32 aer_pos, corr_mask;

Instead of using the preprocessor, use a normal C conditional. From 
`Documentation/process/coding-style.rst`:

> Within code, where possible, use the IS_ENABLED macro to convert a Kconfig
> symbol into a C boolean expression, and use it in a normal C conditional:
> 
> .. code-block:: c                                                  
>                                                                         
>         if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SOMETHING)) {
>                 ...
>         }
> 
> The compiler will constant-fold the conditional away, and include or exclude
> the block of code just as with an #ifdef, so this will not add any runtime
> overhead.  However, this approach still allows the C compiler to see the code
> inside the block, and check it for correctness (syntax, types, symbol
> references, etc).  Thus, you still have to use an #ifdef if the code inside the
> block references symbols that will not exist if the condition is not met.


> +
> +	if (pdev->device != IGC_DEV_ID_I225_LMVP)
> +		return;
> +
> +	aer_pos = pci_find_ext_capability(pdev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ERR);
> +	if (!aer_pos)
> +		return;
> +
> +	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, aer_pos + PCI_ERR_COR_MASK, &corr_mask);
> +
> +	corr_mask |= PCI_ERR_COR_REP_ROLL | PCI_ERR_COR_REP_TIMER;
> +	pci_write_config_dword(pdev, aer_pos + PCI_ERR_COR_MASK, corr_mask);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>   /**
>    * igc_probe - Device Initialization Routine
>    * @pdev: PCI device information struct
> @@ -6236,8 +6256,6 @@ static int igc_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>   	if (err)
>   		goto err_pci_reg;
>   
> -	pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting(pdev);
> -
>   	err = pci_enable_ptm(pdev, NULL);
>   	if (err < 0)
>   		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "PCIe PTM not supported by PCIe bus/controller\n");
> @@ -6272,6 +6290,12 @@ static int igc_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>   	if (!adapter->io_addr)
>   		goto err_ioremap;
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCIEAER
> +	igc_mask_aer_replay_correctible(adapter);
> +#endif
> +
> +	pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting(pdev);
> +
>   	/* hw->hw_addr can be zeroed, so use adapter->io_addr for unmap */
>   	hw->hw_addr = adapter->io_addr;
>   


Kind regards,

Paul