lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98eb5bc7-dee4-b36e-a219-17b1e08d85f6@siemens.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 Jan 2023 10:09:01 +0100
From:   Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To:     Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>, conor.dooley@...rochip.com
Cc:     ajones@...tanamicro.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
        kbingham@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, palmer@...belt.com,
        paul.walmsley@...ive.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] scripts/gdb: add lx_current support for riscv

On 15.11.22 23:10, Deepak Gupta wrote:
> csr_sscratch CSR holds current task_struct address when hart is in
> user space. Trap handler on entry spills csr_sscratch into "tp" (x2)
> register and zeroes out csr_sscratch CSR. Trap handler on exit reloads
> "tp" with expected user mode value and place current task_struct address
> again in csr_sscratch CSR.
> 
> This patch assumes "tp" is pointing to task_struct. If value in
> csr_sscratch is numerically greater than "tp" then it assumes csr_sscratch
> is correct address of current task_struct. This logic holds when
>    - hart is in user space, "tp" will be less than csr_sscratch.
>    - hart is in kernel space but not in trap handler, "tp" will be more
>      than csr_sscratch (csr_sscratch being equal to 0).
>    - hart is executing trap handler
>        - "tp" is still pointing to user mode but csr_sscratch contains
>           ptr to task_struct. Thus numerically higher.
>        - "tp" is  pointing to task_struct but csr_sscratch now contains
>           either 0 or numerically smaller value (transiently holds
>           user mode tp)
> 
> Patch also adds new cached type "ulong" in scripts/gdb/linux/utils.py
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
> 
> ---
> Since patch has changed a little bit from v1 and I didn't include
> changelog earlier, here it is.
> 
> v1 --> v2:
>  - added logic to locate task_struct irrespective of priv
>  - made locating task_struct agnostic to bitness(32 vs 64).
>  - added caching of ulong type in scripts/gdb/linux/utils.py
>  - added more descriptive commit message
> 
> v2 --> v3:
>  - amended commit message and source line to fit column width
> 
> v3 --> v4:
>  - amended commit message and remove whitespace in source
>  - added Reviewed-by for reviewers
> 
> v4 --> v5:
>  - changing the order of changelog and sign off/review tags in commit
> ---
> ---
>  scripts/gdb/linux/cpus.py  | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  scripts/gdb/linux/utils.py |  5 +++++
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/cpus.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/cpus.py
> index 15fc4626d236..14c22f82449b 100644
> --- a/scripts/gdb/linux/cpus.py
> +++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/cpus.py
> @@ -173,6 +173,21 @@ def get_current_task(cpu):
>           else:
>               raise gdb.GdbError("Sorry, obtaining the current task is not allowed "
>                                  "while running in userspace(EL0)")
> +    elif utils.is_target_arch("riscv"):
> +         current_tp = gdb.parse_and_eval("$tp")
> +         scratch_reg = gdb.parse_and_eval("$sscratch")
> +
> +         # by default tp points to current task
> +         current_task = current_tp.cast(task_ptr_type)
> +
> +         # scratch register is set 0 in trap handler after entering kernel.
> +         # When hart is in user mode, scratch register is pointing to task_struct.
> +         # and tp is used by user mode. So when scratch register holds larger value
> +         # (negative address as ulong is larger value) than tp, then use scratch register.
> +         if (scratch_reg.cast(utils.get_ulong_type()) > current_tp.cast(utils.get_ulong_type())):
> +             current_task = scratch_reg.cast(task_ptr_type)

Why not if-else for the assignment here?

> +
> +         return current_task.dereference()
>      else:
>          raise gdb.GdbError("Sorry, obtaining the current task is not yet "
>                             "supported with this arch")
> diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/utils.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/utils.py
> index 1553f68716cc..ddaf3089170d 100644
> --- a/scripts/gdb/linux/utils.py
> +++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/utils.py
> @@ -35,12 +35,17 @@ class CachedType:
>  
>  
>  long_type = CachedType("long")
> +ulong_type = CachedType("ulong")
>  atomic_long_type = CachedType("atomic_long_t")
>  
>  def get_long_type():
>      global long_type
>      return long_type.get_type()
>  
> +def get_ulong_type():
> +    global ulong_type
> +    return ulong_type.get_type()
> +
>  def offset_of(typeobj, field):
>      element = gdb.Value(0).cast(typeobj)
>      return int(str(element[field].address).split()[0], 16)

Looks good to me otherwise.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Technology
Competence Center Embedded Linux

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ